So a French-Russian-Italian-Irish-Indian-South African who's a poor, baldy, gypsy, shortarse, peado (with ginger balls) wearing a football shirt and holding a cat?I feel a mong coming on.
I don't get a racist vibe from the SNP in the slightest. Advocating secession from the UK isn't really racist, is it?
Good point actually, i never got that either. I'll also never understand why during the late 80s and 90s it was somehow acceptable to rubbish Mick Hucknall purely on the basis of being ginger. Even now that sort of vicious snarling baffles me - the guy is genuinely great soul singer and has always seemed pretty chilled out and down to earth in interviews. But he's ginger so we must hate him (apparently).
Mary Bale.I've been looking everywhere but we don't seem to have a thread about all of this. Am I missing it somehow?
Mexicans seem to be fair game ("wetback" being a common term for them), and other hispanic groups HATE being mistaken for Mexicans.I thought that might crop up too.*anxiously awaits vid of her being stuffed in a wheely bin by some kids*
This is generally a thing that people do with disability and also sexuality I find. It's just a shitty excuse and I often pick them up on it.
So being Mick Hucknall is an acceptable form of prejudice.
the way some women here behave like proper fag hags towards him- I find that behaviour horribly patronising and cringe-making
I'm not saying their policies are racist, narrow minded perhaps but not racist. What I don't like about the SNP's support is that there is an element of outright thuggery about some of it. I've never met an SNP supporter who when you ask them about why they vote SNP doesn't pretty much say 'because I hate the English' I dare say there are progressive thinking and open minded SNP voters out there but I've rarely if ever met one.
What exactly do they do? I've not thought further than a fag hag is a woman who likes being friends with a gay man, and hangs around with him a lot. Do they ask him for fashion tips or something? Flirt with him?
Thepuffpastryhangman?
removal of US military presence from Scottish soil
More common, though, is a pervading attitude of "wha's like us" superiority or exceptionalism - we're always banging on about inventing the television, steam engine, telephone[1], our better education system (I suppose it is in some ways), and our continuing attempts to highlight some Caledonian connection to a famous person, no matter how tenuous, in an effort to ingratiate ourselves with their achievement - Neil Armstrong's bizarre visit to Langholm after the moon shot for example, or Elvis' 20-minute stop at Prestwick Airport in the 60s which is guaranteed to pop up every time Reporting Scotland or ITV regional news runs a story on Presley. 1. Though we seem to have invented fuck-all in the last 60 years, sadly
As far as I know, there has been no US military contingent in Scotland since 1992. They don't even use Machrihanish any more.
Even George Orwell felt the need to point out that Eire could only afford its luxury of neutrality and a token domestic military during the Second World War because they relied, unspokenly, de facto, on the UK for their wider defence from the Germans, who would almost certainly have walked into the South during any invasion of the British Isles. By turn, the SNP have a curious idea that we're all going to become pasty-faced emirs and sheikhs from oil revenue, without considering a) who says it'll fall into our economic zone anyway? and b) how do you expect companies to invest in and operate dozens of oil fields if the host country isn't capable of defending them? Like it or not, the world's most important resource needs a considerable investment in a navy and specialist troops. At the moment we have the Royal Navy and Marines, and the Norwegians possess a surprisingly powerful fleet for defence of their offshore fields, as do the Danes. They both take it very seriously.I'd also disagree in part with the characterisation of the SNP as a "progressive" party. Socially, some of their policies are indeed, but they share New Labour's deeply authoritarian style and penchant for proscriptive legislation. For the most part, Scotland has never really had a tradition of individual liberty and rigorous parliamentary debate that so colours England's history (before the Union, our Parliament was notoriously so weak and corrupt the Kirk took care of many domestic matters). You can see that in the Nats response to many issues: ban Buckfast, ban cheap alcohol, ban the legal highs, ban air rifles, ban under-21s from drinking, ban tail docking (mutilating a baby boy's penis is still fine, though), ban foreign landowners, ban tanning salons, ban tobacco advertising and smoking in pubs, ban alcohol advertising, etc. Every perceived problem, no matter how small or tabloid-fuelled, is seen as requiring massive retaliation from central government.These reasons, a general hatred of any kind of nationalism, and the commitment to independence, are why I could never support the SNP. Throwing my lot in with them because I agree with certain of their social policies seems a bit like booking yourself in for major elective surgery because you find the hospital beds comfy.
But, yeah - there will be 'Remember 1314'-style berks that do vote SNP because they watched Braveheart when they were young and it made a big impression on them, but the joke's probably on them.