What's the bleakest facebook photo you've ever seen?

[Hank_Kingsley]

Inspired by that monolithic overheard conversation thread, here's a thread for posting real-life bleak images for the sneering approval of others.

I expect this to be a roaring disaster, so prove me wrong my lovelies...

[Hank_Kingsley]

Fine then anonymous tagger!

I found it bleak, find something bleaker...

Maybe it's not that bleak.

Back to the drawing board.

[Koant]

[sproggy]

Is that first one Zammo?


No... Zammo wouldn't tie his scarf with a cunt-knot.

[untitled_london]

not really bleak, but, entertaining in the wrong sense:

(Removed:  Please don't come back.)

[sproggy]

*clears cache & logs off*

[Neil]

What a sick fucking idiot.

EDIT:  I guess that also proves what I was told about the true identity of a certain poster.

[Mr Faineant]

not really bleak, but, entertaining in the wrong sense:

(Removed:  Please don't come back.)

is that a real life banning i have just witnessed? or is the dont come back in reference to a lewd image or something?

[Neil]

Both.  Lewd doesn't even begin to cover it.

[Mr Faineant]

see, i should talk about this in the "are you susceptible to advertising" thread. Any advert, especially for a film, that leaves me with this much curiosity, i will definately buy into. Damn my curiosity!

[Neil]

I really cannot believe he thought that was cool to post here, and that he thought it was in ANY way "entertaining."  What a fucking DICK.  Please, folks, if you see stuff that goes THAT far over the line, use the report button.  I was gonna turn that off as it's just a default setting, but that there are users unbelievably stupid enough to post that kind of thing - and have those of us unlucky enough to have witnessed it spend the rest of the night wondering if they should FORMAT THEIR HARD DRIVES...that alone merits its continued existence.  I don't even come in this sub-forum that often, and it was sheer fluke that I caught that.  Jesus fuck. 

[sproggy]

Aye, that Tilted_London is a swarthy rum'un

[rudi]

Both.  Lewd doesn't even begin to cover it.

How illegal was it?

Give us a CLUE man! :)

[Neil]

http://www.cookdandbombd.co.uk/forums/index.php?topic=17691.0

http://www.cookdandbombd.co.uk/forums/index.php?action=tags;id=25383

Please alert me immediately if you see him here under another account, he was going nuts trying to get back in last night.

While looking into untitled_london's IP history last night, I found some other interesting posts he made:

http://www.cookdandbombd.co.uk/forums/index.php?topic=13559.msg644457#msg644457
http://www.cookdandbombd.co.uk/forums/index.php?topic=13091.0

For fucks sake.

[Sovereign]

What a sick fucking idiot.

EDIT:  I guess that also proves what I was told about the true identity of a certain poster.

Out of curiosity, which certain poster is this? Is it who I think it is? I would ask you to tell us what he posted, because it takes something really fucked up to get instantly banned form here, but then again I dont wanna push you on it. And if U_L was the troll I'm thinking of I've been witness to some of the other stuff that he has posted up and I can understand your reaction.

He seemed reasonably sound to me, what a shame to lose an otherwise decent poster in a moment of madness.

EDIT: Oh, it is Voluntary Mastectomy then. I remember some of the pictures he posted, jesus wept.

[Hank_Kingsley]

The sarcastic taggers are right, this was an epic fail of a thread!

It did lead to the Agatha Christie-esque unveiling of the mysterious V.M but that was about all.

I'm very very sorry, I won't be starting any misanthropic threads again.

[Neil]

It's really not your fault, and it's not that bad of a thread idea.  Don't worry about it. 

[wherearethespoons]

and have those of us unlucky enough to have witnessed it spend the rest of the night wondering if they should FORMAT THEIR HARD DRIVES...

Er, yeah I was sort of wondering that as soon as it showed up. Bollocks. I'm impressed you got involved so quickly though. Top marks.

[chocky909]

My curiosity is really strong now. untitled_london seemed like a decent poster generally to me. I have no idea who he may have been before or what he posted that was unsuitable.

I wish someone would say what he posted. Is there anything that bad that it can't even be described?

[buttgammon]

Yes, there is actually.

I didn't see what was posted (fortunately) but I think I have an idea and it really is not nice at all.

[CaledonianGonzo]

Use your imagination - VM posted photos of an unsavoury nature involving girls that may not have been 'of age' - the important thing is that no one gets in trouble over it if they're on an employer's network.

Cheers for sorting it, Neil.

[chocky909]

You're right. It's probably best left undiscussed.

[boxofslice]

If what was posted is what I'm thinking was posted, I hope this doesn't lead to some of us being involed in some kind of 'Operation Ore' situation.

[Eight Taiwanese Teenagers]

bye paul

[Fry]

Can we try this again, but with less CP?
This thread could have been quite funny.

[Milo]

I have been searching for someone I've seen out and about (in an admittedly pathetic stalkerish fashion) and stumbled across this specimen:

[levitica]

On  her myspace, my friend has posted a picture of herself on the toilet.  Like, with pants down and everything. 
I can't post it though, since she actually is a friend.

[rudi]

To make up for that, here's a picture of me on the toilet instead. No need to thank me.

[Fry]

I have been searching for someone I've seen out and about (in an admittedly pathetic stalkerish fashion) and stumbled across this specimen:


[/quote
Hahaha, that is actually fantastic.

[Hank_Kingsley]