Author Topic: ::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE  (Read 3281 times)

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #30 on: June 17, 2004, 06:53:18 PM »
Mook.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #31 on: June 17, 2004, 06:55:35 PM »
Mook.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #32 on: June 17, 2004, 07:10:42 PM »
Mook

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #33 on: June 17, 2004, 07:15:38 PM »
no_offenc

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #34 on: June 17, 2004, 07:15:41 PM »
Mook 1 ½ ½
no_offenc ½ 1 1

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #35 on: June 17, 2004, 07:22:45 PM »
no_offenc.

Timmay

  • Dragging sexism into the 21st century
    • http://www.cabmirror.co.uk/
::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #36 on: June 17, 2004, 08:21:54 PM »
mook, although I loved no_offenc's BB inspired last one.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #37 on: June 17, 2004, 08:34:36 PM »
i go for the mooky boy

Frinky

  • Enormous chip on shoulder stemming from insurmountable superiority complex
::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #38 on: June 17, 2004, 09:57:23 PM »
Mook!

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #39 on: June 17, 2004, 10:29:10 PM »
mook

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #40 on: June 18, 2004, 01:30:34 AM »
mook, his second pic just looks really good.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #41 on: June 18, 2004, 07:35:02 PM »
I think Mook gets it.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #42 on: June 18, 2004, 07:53:24 PM »
Mook

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #43 on: June 18, 2004, 08:06:47 PM »
edit: oh, i've voted here already.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #44 on: June 18, 2004, 08:52:33 PM »
hehehe i almost keep doing that.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #45 on: June 18, 2004, 09:01:43 PM »
I'll say mook, although I liked no_offenc's second shot best

fanny splendid

  • Chaos Reigns
::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #46 on: June 18, 2004, 09:22:02 PM »
no_offenc's laser eyed, arse-victor.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #47 on: June 18, 2004, 10:11:27 PM »
I vote mook but I did like no_offenc's Big Brother image.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #48 on: June 19, 2004, 07:21:46 PM »
I'd also like to register one for the Mookster - well played though No Offenc.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #49 on: June 19, 2004, 08:05:37 PM »
Mook

Vermschneid Mehearties

  • phpBB A lesson in quantity over quality
    • http://www.theenoeffect.tk
::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #50 on: June 19, 2004, 09:27:32 PM »
no_offenc was palpably superior, though mooks late rally was worthy of note, no_offenc was able to match it, and run home crying to mother better than mook did.

::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #51 on: June 20, 2004, 02:38:35 PM »
no offenc..

Bogey

  • Let's face it, in this job I see a lot of penises.
::::VOTING TIME::::mook versus no-offenc...ROUND ONE
« Reply #52 on: June 20, 2004, 07:22:18 PM »
Much as I admire mook monging skills, for his Victor-death-bot, no_offenc pips it.