Started by Cerys, February 17, 2013, 04:28:26 PM
Quote from: Steven on February 17, 2013, 04:22:35 PMThe Muchmore and Nix films only show a second or two of the actual assassination, basically a bad angle of the headshot moment, they would not have to be altered at all if they didn't show any compromising evidence, however the much later altering of the Zapruder film would obviously have to seem consistent with them for those few seconds. The Zap film does not show the right brake light flashing as the car slows down but the left one does, as the Nix film, however the Muchmore one does show the right brake light flash red. This proves at least some alteration to me. There may be more inconsistencies but they are of such poor quality it's hard for me to judge at the moment.The Umbrella man was another liar sent forward to probably obfuscate matters, whether he was there or not - the Umbrella he claimed was the same one from the film was presented to the committee on assassinations, except it didn't have the same number of prongs - hence a totally different make of umbrella.
Quote from: biggytitbo on February 17, 2013, 03:40:25 PMthe SBT, which was dreamt up by a lawyer
Quote from: biggytitbo on February 17, 2013, 04:54:22 PMIt's not implausible, it just didn't happen in this case.The first bullet,which hit Kennnedy in the back, didn't exit so it could not have hit Connolly.Thst much was made clear at the autopsy. Not only did it not pass all the way through, it couldn't have without shattering his spine, which it didn't.So it falls down at step one. But even if we suppose it did pass through, there are at least a dozen other rock solid reasons why it didnt happen as the official story would have it.
Quote from: dr_christian_troy on February 17, 2013, 04:37:58 PM
Quote from: Steven on February 17, 2013, 04:50:18 PMI find your analysis a bit ridiculous, you keep making up supposed contentions that only exist in your head. You sound exactly like a bad spectator witnessing a magic trick and trying to work it out.
Quote from: Pepotamo1985 on February 17, 2013, 06:00:58 PMAnd you sound exactly like someone who's watched one episode of Penn & Teller and stands at the back of a magic show shouting "I know how that was done" after each trick, and when people start asking you how following the show, you pop to the shitter.Sorry, but in t'other thread you kept authoritatively stating quite bewildering stuff ("the film is clearly made of cheese") and haven't yet offered any response to people doubting or questioning this state of affairs.
Quote from: biggytitbo on February 17, 2013, 05:18:42 PMI'm not privy to any special facts.
Quote from: massive bereavement on February 17, 2013, 09:19:13 PMI reckon it was somebody who really hated that Connally bloke and shot the Pres by mistake.
Quote from: biggytitbo on February 17, 2013, 08:34:16 PMThe onus isnt on me to come up with a detailed alternative theory, especially since its 50 years ago and most of the evidence is either gone or horribly tainted.
Quote from: biggytitbo on February 17, 2013, 08:34:16 PMI think 2 of the shots probably came from the TSBD and 1 came from one of the other buildings to the rear of the motorcade, which were never investigated due to them quickly fixating on the TSBD.
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 23 queries.