Author Topic: Old Doctor Who - Part 3  (Read 137112 times)

Bad Ambassador

  • Sit down, Mario!
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1860 on: January 15, 2019, 03:10:47 PM »
Got it. It's Matt Smith in the bowler. That's from the Sally Lockhart Show.

Norton Canes

  • Watching the Wednesday wheel
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1861 on: January 15, 2019, 03:31:22 PM »
Thinking about my answer, now not so sure about it. Thought it was the Troughton one next to the Two Doctors shot, don't remember it from any other story. Thought it was Trout's face superimposed on Barbara in her Aztecs get-up but I've Googled that and it's not the same.

Jodie's second hat is from The Witchfinders but I can't remember if she actually tries it on. Matt in the bowler is from the sepia flashback sequence of The Crimson Horror. Rose's beret... you might be onto something there. Did Tennant ever wear a fez in Day Of The Doctor..?

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1862 on: January 15, 2019, 04:39:46 PM »
I have no memory of Pertwee in a flat cap.

Norton Canes

  • Watching the Wednesday wheel
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1863 on: January 15, 2019, 05:15:20 PM »
I think it's from the same publicity photo session as the one next to it, so I presume they're counting both.

Right, finished work, looking at answers.

Ah.

Replies From View

  • Rubbing linseed oil into the school cormorant.
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Gargoyles have milk bags.
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1864 on: January 15, 2019, 05:20:08 PM »
My gut feeling is that it'll be a new series one, as things like this are normally pitched at the newer/younger viewers.  Either Rose wearing the beret or the thirteenth Doctor in her top hat.

Norton Canes

  • Watching the Wednesday wheel
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1865 on: January 15, 2019, 05:22:14 PM »
It's certainly not the Troughton one next to the Two Doctors shot, but what story is that from? Don't recognise it at all.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1866 on: January 15, 2019, 05:36:00 PM »
It's certainly not the Troughton one next to the Two Doctors shot, but what story is that from? Don't recognise it at all.

Underwater Menace.

daf

  • Laminated with 'Clarifoil'
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1867 on: January 15, 2019, 05:36:46 PM »

Nothing in a hat can stop him now!!


Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1868 on: January 15, 2019, 06:40:52 PM »
A bit late, did Sandifer use to be a man?

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1869 on: January 15, 2019, 06:58:30 PM »
She transitioned last year IIRC.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1870 on: January 15, 2019, 07:03:07 PM »
She transitioned last year IIRC.

I thought it was a bit of a coincidence that there were two Sandifers. I used to read her blog when she was Mark. Still spouting nonsense though.

Such as stating that the Big Finish range has no merit.

Bad Ambassador

  • Sit down, Mario!
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1871 on: January 15, 2019, 08:22:33 PM »
I used to read her blog when she was Mark.

What about when she was Philip?

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1872 on: January 15, 2019, 08:45:44 PM »
What about when she was Philip?

Ah, no idea where I got Mark from?

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1873 on: January 15, 2019, 08:58:46 PM »
I have no memory of Pertwee in a flat cap.

Looks like the hat trying on scene from Spearhead From Space?

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1874 on: January 15, 2019, 09:08:07 PM »
Looks like the hat trying on scene from Spearhead From Space?

Ah bum. You're right.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1875 on: January 15, 2019, 09:36:04 PM »
I thought it was a bit of a coincidence that there were two Sandifers. I used to read her blog when she was Mark. Still spouting nonsense though.

Such as stating that the Big Finish range has no merit.

Hard to argue with some of her conclusions though...

http://www.eruditorumpress.com/blog/you-were-expecting-someone-else-unit-assembled/

"The creative case for making a hundred and twenty-three separate Doctor Who audios in a single year is non-existent."

Jerzy Bondov

  • give my cheeky volvic a bash
    • righto so ive got five minutes off work and uh yeah im gonna have a cheeky volvic
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1876 on: January 16, 2019, 10:57:52 AM »
I do quite often agree with Sandifer but when I disagree I really disagree. I think when you write as much about Who as she does you're bound to say some correct things from time to time.

Norton Canes

  • Watching the Wednesday wheel
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1877 on: January 16, 2019, 11:58:17 AM »
Her stuff is generally interesting enough but it's just so dry, the academic tone really drags it down. There's no sense of joy or enthusiasm in it whatsoever. Rob Shearman remains my favourite Who 'analyst', you can sense his love for the show even when he's criticising it. Even Larry Miles' stuff was enjoyable acerbic. But Sandifer is a real chore to read.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1878 on: January 16, 2019, 03:01:53 PM »
As a friend of mine once put it " Back in the RTD era if you argued with Jonathan Miles, say, that the show was crap and his claims for it as of higher quality than it ever was, he could piunt to the audience figure and AIs as support for his arguments. Argue with Sandifer and she points to her PhD"

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1879 on: January 16, 2019, 04:28:32 PM »
Forget this nonsense. Which is the fake hat?!!!

Replies From View

  • Rubbing linseed oil into the school cormorant.
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Gargoyles have milk bags.
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1880 on: January 16, 2019, 05:23:16 PM »
Forget this nonsense. Which is the fake hat?!!!

Hmm.  Do you deserve to know?

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1881 on: January 16, 2019, 05:57:47 PM »
Hmm.  Do you deserve to know?

Damn right I do!

Replies From View

  • Rubbing linseed oil into the school cormorant.
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Gargoyles have milk bags.
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1882 on: January 16, 2019, 05:58:55 PM »
Damn right I do!

Well I'm afraid you actually don't, sorry.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1883 on: January 16, 2019, 06:10:17 PM »
Her stuff is generally interesting enough but it's just so dry, the academic tone really drags it down. There's no sense of joy or enthusiasm in it whatsoever. Rob Shearman remains my favourite Who 'analyst', you can sense his love for the show even when he's criticising it. Even Larry Miles' stuff was enjoyable acerbic. But Sandifer is a real chore to read.

That's not the only tone she uses though, the recent Resolution review is a good fun Chibnall-kicking.
http://www.eruditorumpress.com/blog/resolution-review/

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1884 on: January 16, 2019, 06:24:30 PM »
Well I'm afraid you actually don't, sorry.

Bitch.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1885 on: January 17, 2019, 07:20:48 AM »
Forget this nonsense. Which is the fake hat?!!!

I think it is the photo from Turn Left with Rose in a beret, as she doesn't wear one in the episode.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1886 on: January 17, 2019, 08:47:29 AM »
I think it is the photo from Turn Left with Rose in a beret, as she doesn't wear one in the episode.

Thanks. Haven't watched that in years so had no idea.

Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1887 on: January 17, 2019, 10:50:19 PM »


Colonel Archer in Resurrection of the Daleks.


purlieu

  • Woo-hoo, Lord Nimon!
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1888 on: January 19, 2019, 11:29:51 AM »
Eric Saward is finally putting out novelisations of Resurrection and Revelation, on 14th November.
Click for covers.

(what)
« Last Edit: January 19, 2019, 01:11:49 PM by purlieu »

pigamus

  • Sex, death, mayonnaise.
Re: Old Doctor Who - Part 3
« Reply #1889 on: January 19, 2019, 12:08:28 PM »
Goodness me but that cover is shit. 'Will this do' of the highest order.