'New' Brexit Thread 2 - The Empire Strikes Back

[Paulie Walnuts]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Kk7iXLGjbQ

[Shoulders?-Stomach!]

1 year on:

https://www.facebook.com/conservatives/videos/10155039705029279/

JUST ELEVEN DAYS AFTER THE POLLS CLOSE

THE OUTCOME OF THESE NEGOTIATIONS IS CENTRAL TO EVERYTHING

She ain't lying


0 non-whites appear in the montage btw

[olliebean]

0 non-whites appear in the montage btw

But it does include someone with a union flag on a flagpole in their garden ffs, like anyone who can be trusted not to be a raving bigot would ever have such a thing.

[buttgammon]

But it does include someone with a union flag on a flagpole in their garden ffs, like anyone who can be trusted not to be a raving bigot would ever have such a thing.

I'll never understand people who do stuff like this. WE KNOW WHAT COUNTRY WE'RE IN!

[king_tubby]

Well, this sounds good.

May says: "Over August and September we are going to be releasing a number of technical notifications to set out what UK citizens and businesses need to do in a no deal scenario, so making much more public awareness of the preparations. We imagine there are going to be around 70 of those technical notices that will be issued."

[Replies From View]

NO DEAL SCENARIO TO-DO LIST (BUSINESS VERSION):

1) GO BANKRUPT.



PLEASE LET YOUR MP KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY IMMEDIATE CONCERNS.

[Zetetic]

And there's a decent chance none of makes the slightest bit of difference to the EU's response to the proposal.

Yep.

[Bhazor]

I keep forgetting the DUP exist.



And that they're cunts.

[Shoulders?-Stomach!]

Why did around 20 Labour MPs seemingly not turn up?

[Zetetic]

Some away, like Cat Smith and Laura Pidcock. These will have been paired with missing Tory MPs but there are only 12 Tories missing, I think. (Noting that the Tories violated Jo Swinson's pairing, it seems.)

[Replies From View]

Some away, like Cat Smith and Laura Pidcock. These will have been paired with missing Tory MPs but there are only 12 Tories missing, I think. (Noting that the Tories violated Jo Swinson's pairing, it seems.)

It seems to me like the whole pairing concept can't be trusted; an agreement to pair is made and the Tories turn up to vote?  This happened recently in a much bigger way if I recall.

[greencalx]

Yip. Most often shrieks of "X didn't turn up to vote" result in an explanation that X was in fact ill, or was paired with someone who was ill. But as we can see, this system is open to abuse. They really need to reform the way voting is done. But they won't of course.

[Sebastian Cobb]

Throw the careerists in a skip.

[Replies From View]

I honestly don't think I could even trust a Tory to scratch my cock.

[Sebastian Cobb]

I honestly don't think I could even trust a Tory to scratch my cock.

They'd see it off if they thought they could get away with it.

[Replies From View]

They'd see it off if they thought they could get away with it.

It makes me shudder to think about.  Yet I can't stop.  Please help.

[jobotic]

Brexiters can't walk past a vote without wanting to cheat at it can they?

[Johnny Yesno]

Another example of the tories passing off their own cuntiness onto the EU:

https://www.gdpr.associates/new-uk-data-protection-rules-cynical-attack-immigrants/

In September, I warned in a Guardian opinion article that the Brexit process could have the effect of allowing the UK government to bring in more draconian and discriminatory immigration laws, harking back to the 70s and 80s.

Many people wondered how this would happen and the answer was that Brexit would allow the sweeping away of advances like the abolition of the hated primary purpose immigration rule made illegal by the European court of justice.

But now a far more profound and deliberate line of attack is being adopted by the British government in its national immigration policy, under cover of implementing the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), one of the biggest modernisations of data protection law anywhere in the world. Simply put, a new clause in the government's data protection bill, which implements the GDPR, would remove the rights of people who are subject to an immigration procedure to know what public authorities hold about them and to rectify or delete erroneous or unlawfully collected personal data.

So, in essence, what is happening here is that the UK government, under the cover of the complexity of data protection law in particular, and its chaotic Brexit negotiations in general, is seeking to create damaging new discriminatory national immigration restrictions. In addition, the government is undermining the implementation of the most important piece of EU data protection law ever drafted, which will have the knock-on effect of undermining the ability of the UK to ensure the free flow of data post-Brexit. This, as people will have seen this week, could have major economic and security implications for the UK.

[New Jack]

I honestly don't think I could even trust a Tory to scratch my cock.

If by 'scratch' you mean abuse, and 'cock' you mean civil liberties, then you shouldn't trust them, no.

Also the same goes for scratching your cock, as you originally said

[Replies From View]

If by 'scratch' you mean abuse, and 'cock' you mean civil liberties, then you shouldn't trust them, no.

Also the same goes for scratching your cock, as you originally said

I did mean just literally scratching my cock, yeah.

[Paulie Walnuts]

In September, I warned in a Guardian opinion article

lol

[Johnny Yesno]

Yes, it's hilarious when you can't see the data the Home Office used to make a decision about whether you can remain in the UK. And democratic.

[Bhazor]

Did somebody say democratic? Urrghhhhhh fuck yes. MMMmmmmmm, roll up a ballot paper and sound the love sauce out of me.

[Paul Calf]

Imagine standing behind the croupier in a casino sneering and mocking the losers and waving an 'I love the casino' flag.

That's Walnuts.

[jobotic]

Paulie, why is it okay for the POTUS to interfere in British democracy now?

[Paulie Walnuts]

Can someone tell me what cockblockit said? I've got it on block

in the meantime;

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-imf/no-deal-brexit-would-cost-european-union-1-5-pct-of-gdp-imf-idUKKBN1K9235

The EU's lost economic output in the case of no deal would cost the bloc around $250 billion

but ya can't floy over ar skoies, so it is

Imagine standing behind the croupier in a casino sneering and mocking the losers and waving an 'I love the casino' flag.

That's Walnuts.

Imagine using legal technicalities and the incompetence of our politicians to undermine the clear democratic will of the people

That's you guys

[Pseudopath]

$250 billion is around 1.5% of the EU's GDP.

The UK Government's own impact analysis of the various exit scenarios predicted that an exit on WTO terms would affect our GDP by up to 10.3% ($269 billion): https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-no-deal-uk-economy-suffer-more-eu-imf-warning-a8454916.html

[Paulie Walnuts]

yep, pain all round

it's almost as though the EU are acting like a spiteful, spurned lover, hoping no-one else deserts them

thank fuck we're leaving in 8 months

[Johnny Yesno]

Can someone tell me what cockblockit said? I've got it on block

Why don't you block everyone here who hates you by fucking off?

Imagine using legal technicalities and the incompetence of our politicians to undermine the clear triumph of the will

What you meant.

[Zetetic]

Some things are more important than money, I guess.