Author Topic: Bond  (Read 25542 times)

Re: Bond
« Reply #600 on: April 09, 2019, 10:05:55 PM »
That's the one bit of Goldfinger I always enjoyed, and still do.  One of the rare times he's completely demeaned, even moreso because it's just a fucking switch (presumably ON-OFF).  And the "tut, you cunt" look the guy gives him as he walks away.  Most unlike the climax to a 60s action film, let alone the climax to a Bond film.

I guess it does lead to the time/physics/sense defying joke where the timer stops on "007".

I mean...yeah, why the fuck not at that point?

thecuriousorange

  • WELCOME THRILLHOU
Re: Bond
« Reply #601 on: April 15, 2019, 11:00:08 PM »
Fleabag's Phoebe Waller-Bridge drafted in to work on the script after Daniel Craig requests more humour. Hmmm, the silly stuff in the last one was messy and I was hoping for something a bit more serious. I liked what I saw of Fleabag though and Craig's Bond run has had its ups and downs so why not try it. This article also says Rami Malek's villian is rumoured to be a version of Blofeld.

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/apr/14/james-bond-script-phoebe-waller-bridge-fleabag-daniel-craig

I'm thinking Diamonds Are Forever. Blofeld with new face: check. Wacky gags: check. Disillusioned star back for one big payday: Cheque please!

Re: Bond
« Reply #602 on: April 15, 2019, 11:33:43 PM »
Isn't Bond meant to be ex-Navy? There hasn't been anything exploring that, has there? That era would surely have been a better genesis of a relationship with Blofeld than childhood.

I do think a good Bond film can still be made but it would have to be via a complete overhaul of the typical form and structure. The Craig films are essentially still tethered to the Bond films of the past, just tonally a bit different, lending them a very tired quality.

Kelvin

  • The best bits of a pantomime horse
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • With skin the colour of a freshly peeled apple
Re: Bond
« Reply #603 on: April 15, 2019, 11:57:59 PM »
This article also says Rami Malek's villian is rumoured to be a version of Blofeld.

How would that be possible? He's 20 years younger than Christoph Waltz from the last film, surely?

Re: Bond
« Reply #604 on: April 16, 2019, 07:56:29 AM »
Hmmm, the silly stuff in the last one was messy

I think the problem was that a lot of it was an attempt to shoehorn in some Moore style silliness though wasn't it.

gilbertharding

  • Not even the rudest man in the Beatles
Re: Bond
« Reply #605 on: April 16, 2019, 09:35:16 AM »
Talking about tonal problems in various eras, there's an early scene in one of the Brosnan ones where Bond, M and Moneypenny are speeding through London in a Daimler 420 limousine from a meeting at the Ministry of Defence. I mean SPEEDING - this car's door handles are scraping the tarmac as it goes round corners. The tyres are peeling off the rims. It's not clear why, exactly, they're going so fast. No-one is chasing them. And the three of them are drinking champagne from crystal glasses, in the car. Again - they've come from a serious (!) meeting, and are going back to the office (to type up the minutes? Expedite their action points?). At one point Moneypenny makes a filthy suggestion (I can't remember what, but it's really off).

Re: Bond
« Reply #606 on: April 16, 2019, 10:45:31 AM »
Talking about tonal problems in various eras, there's an early scene in one of the Brosnan ones where Bond, M and Moneypenny are speeding through London in a Daimler 420 limousine from a meeting at the Ministry of Defence. I mean SPEEDING - this car's door handles are scraping the tarmac as it goes round corners. The tyres are peeling off the rims. It's not clear why, exactly, they're going so fast. No-one is chasing them. And the three of them are drinking champagne from crystal glasses, in the car. Again - they've come from a serious (!) meeting, and are going back to the office (to type up the minutes? Expedite their action points?). At one point Moneypenny makes a filthy suggestion (I can't remember what, but it's really off).

It's in Tomorrow Never Dies, isn't it? And M suggests that Bond will need to 'pump' Teri Hatcher's character for information. Moneypenny then says to Bond: "You'll just have to decide how much pumping is necessary."

I'll admit, I laughed.

Aside from Goldeneye, the Brosnan films just felt so soulless. Probably more a sign of the times. Late 90s there were just loads of bland action flicks.

Re: Bond
« Reply #607 on: April 16, 2019, 10:49:13 AM »
Tricky. “Probably going to shag her” doesn’t mean he ever actually did - just look at Olga Kurylenko’s chaescter in QoS, they definitely didn’t. Or at least I don’t think so (they did look quite rumpled walking down that mountain to catch the bus). And he never really got an opportunity with Klebb - or had the time with Irma Bunt in OHMSS. So his success rate isn’t 100%. But still, balance of probability weighs heavy in favour of your theory.

They didn't. She survived.

Up until the end of Skyfall, every single one of Craig's conquests got offed.

I gave up on Spectre, so assume a brick fell and killed the lass at the end.

machotrouts

  • Member
  • **
    • Twitter
Re: Bond
« Reply #608 on: April 16, 2019, 11:25:42 AM »
Moneypenny then says to Bond: "You'll just have to decide how much pumping is necessary."

is this a shag joke or a fart joke

Re: Bond
« Reply #609 on: April 16, 2019, 11:51:33 AM »
is this a shag joke or a fart joke

Ah, see I live in Scotland where pump = shag. I forget that in England it means fart. I was a little confused when I discovered the children's character Princess Pumpalot.

gilbertharding

  • Not even the rudest man in the Beatles
Re: Bond
« Reply #610 on: April 16, 2019, 01:29:14 PM »
It's in Tomorrow Never Dies, isn't it? And M suggests that Bond will need to 'pump' Teri Hatcher's character for information. Moneypenny then says to Bond: "You'll just have to decide how much pumping is necessary."

I'll admit, I laughed.

Aside from Goldeneye, the Brosnan films just felt so soulless. Probably more a sign of the times. Late 90s there were just loads of bland action flicks.

I tried to find the quote. I dug up one where she's basically reminding him of another time when he gave her a lickout: "You always were a cunning linguist James."

gilbertharding

  • Not even the rudest man in the Beatles
Re: Bond
« Reply #611 on: April 16, 2019, 01:31:39 PM »
Ah, see I live in Scotland where pump = shag. I forget that in England it means fart. I was a little confused when I discovered the children's character Princess Pumpalot.

I'm not Scottish, but I thought pump could mean either a fart or a shag up there too, same as here in England. Context is king.

I've just realised I've mixed up Viz with actual DC Thompson...

Re: Bond
« Reply #612 on: April 16, 2019, 02:08:02 PM »
I'm not Scottish, but I thought pump could mean either a fart or a shag up there too, same as here in England. Context is king.

I've just realised I've mixed up Viz with actual DC Thompson...

I've never heard anyone in Scotland use 'pump' to mean fart.

Though it can mean excited too. "I'm pure pumped."

gilbertharding

  • Not even the rudest man in the Beatles
Re: Bond
« Reply #613 on: April 16, 2019, 02:14:51 PM »
As I say - Johnny Fartpants was king of the pumps - but I realised as I was typing that he's not from Dundee. Oor Wullie never trod on a duck, did he?

Wet Blanket

  • I am the Colour Blind Dog-Thief
Re: Bond
« Reply #614 on: April 16, 2019, 02:17:23 PM »
I've never heard anyone in Scotland use 'pump' to mean fart.

Though it can mean excited too. "I'm pure pumped."

Maybe you don't count Edinburgh as proper Scotland but my friend's little girl and her pals all use the term pump for a bum burp and find it, quite rightly, hilarious.

thecuriousorange

  • WELCOME THRILLHOU
Re: Bond
« Reply #615 on: April 16, 2019, 02:40:56 PM »
How would that be possible? He's 20 years younger than Christoph Waltz from the last film, surely?

Having an entirely new head in every film is kind of Blofeld's thing though

gilbertharding

  • Not even the rudest man in the Beatles
Re: Bond
« Reply #616 on: April 16, 2019, 02:49:37 PM »
Why are we talking about farting in a Bond thread?

Quote from: Ian Fleming
Bond reached the door, and with a single economic movement, pulled the special device Q had given him in the last chapter from the special compartment in the heel of one of his calfskin Oxford brogues, handmade for him by Crockett and Jones of Jermyn Street. As he squatted to address his attention to the lock, a sudden gust of wind emerged from the seat of his lightweight blue worsted trousers. "Silent but violent," he thought to himself, allowing a wry smile to play across his cruel, thin lips.

Die All Over Again (1958)
« Last Edit: April 16, 2019, 03:04:28 PM by gilbertharding »

Re: Bond
« Reply #617 on: April 16, 2019, 02:56:39 PM »
Bond is King of Bantz.

In the next film I hope they have a scene where Blofield gives himself away by letting a fart slip out.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2019, 03:08:43 PM by lipsink »

thecuriousorange

  • WELCOME THRILLHOU
Re: Bond
« Reply #618 on: April 16, 2019, 05:28:40 PM »
If each Bond actor's first outing was a classic (or at last quite good), the last ones are all awful and I have no optimism for this. A View to a Kill, anyone? Die Another Day? It can't be as bad as those, but it won't even be as good as Licence to Kill.

kidsick5000

  • Gotta be groovy for the moovy
Re: Bond
« Reply #619 on: April 18, 2019, 02:51:14 AM »
“Silent but violent”

I’ve haven’t heard that in years. I’ve been giggling to myself at it far too much today.
It sounds best in Connery’s voice. But a wry Moore take isn’t bad either

Re: Bond
« Reply #620 on: April 18, 2019, 03:12:27 AM »

Aside from Goldeneye, the Brosnan films just felt so soulless. Probably more a sign of the times. Late 90s there were just loads of bland action flicks.

Yeah, I think Brosnan was perfectly likable but the films were beyond pedestrian.

My fondness for Goldeneye is mainly because of the game I think.

Re: Bond
« Reply #621 on: April 18, 2019, 05:26:13 AM »
If each Bond actor's first outing was a classic (or at last quite good), the last ones are all awful and I have no optimism for this. A View to a Kill, anyone? Die Another Day? It can't be as bad as those, but it won't even be as good as Licence to Kill.

Must admit I'v never really seen View to a Kill as being that bad, a bit tired/uninspired maybe but Walken is probably up there with the best Bond villians and he gets a lot of screen time rather than just lurking in his lair.