Author Topic: [muso] Recording Vocals  (Read 317 times)

[muso] Recording Vocals
« on: February 17, 2005, 04:51:04 PM »
...

[muso] Recording Vocals
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2005, 05:28:06 PM »
Yes, a decent microphone is essential. And a decent preamp. But mic is much more important.

For my last EP I used an AKG C1000S, which is a budget condensor mic (it's about £100 these days I think). It's a handy little thing, cos you can put a battery in it incase your preamp doesn't support phantom power (all condensors use phantom power).

That was running through a Mackie mixer into an M-audio Delta 66 interface to my mac. But you don't necessarily need all that stuff. Nowadays I'm using a Rode NT2000 which is great, but costs £300.

People who actually know about muics properly should post below.

[muso] Recording Vocals
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2005, 09:35:30 PM »
Quote
I'm using a Pod XT as an interface, with all the guitar-amp stuff turned off so it acts as a basic pre-amp. I don't see any reason why this can't be made to work acceptably.


OK, the reason this won't work very well is that mic preamps are different from guitar preamps. I think impedence has something to do with it. Anyway, you'll need a proper mic preamp. Avoid soundcard mic inputs at all cost, they are noisy as hell. Best thing to do might be start saving for a mixer, it'll come in very handy if you want to do serious home recording, and it'll have mic pre-amps. If you don't need that many channels you could get a standalone mic pre-amp which would probably be better quality than a pre-amp built into a mixer. It might also have EQ and compression as well.

Speaking of which, compression is practically a necessity when recording vocals. Not many people can sing at a completely even level, so you can end up with the volume right up in the mix but still not very clear at points. Compression will even this out. You'd be surprised how much of a difference it can make.

A better mic would also clearly be beneficial, but if you get the pre-amp sorted out you should still be able to get useable results with a cheap crappy mic (good enough for demos/just getting ideas down at least). As for mic placement, 6 inches does sound a bit far away; best to let the singer do whatever they're comfortable with, bearing in mind that the closer you get to the mic the bassier the signal gets.

You mentioned  using a sock as a popper-stopper. Best way to do that is to bend a wire coat hanger into a circle and mount that between the vocalist and the mic (rather than just wrapping the sock round the mic). Also they usually recommend stockings for that, but thin enough socks should be ok. Anything too thick and I think you'd be getting rid of more than just pops...

Hope that's been of some help..

Dan

Pepotamo1985

  • British people in hot weather
[muso] Recording Vocals
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2005, 10:02:49 PM »
You need a good pair of headphones. Seriously.

[muso] Recording Vocals
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2005, 10:27:00 PM »
Yes, there's a basic rule...Shit in - shit out.

Sometimes you can get the perfect result with the strangest gear, but if you're recording vocals seriously, then you have to do it properly...Then you can sod about with it afterwards. This needn't be very expensive...I use a Rode NT1 and a joemeek VC3 (But dream of a U87 and a BBC channel).

Record the voice with the mouth a few inches away from the mic with a popshield (Tights/coathanger) in between. Like Spiney Norman says, apply a little compression to even out the signal a bit and also add a little reverb if poss to the monitor channel (So it sounds nice for the singer, but the reverb doesn't go to 'tape') and bob's yer uncle.

Quote from: "Cardinal Tit Storm"
I've got a bit of a mental block about singing loudly at home as well, but I don't suppose there's much can be done about that. Must...increase....confidence...


hehe...I've got that too and send Mrs. Gaz out on errands when I have to do some vocals!!!

[muso] Recording Vocals
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2005, 10:21:27 AM »
...