Author Topic: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed  (Read 56371 times)

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #990 on: October 13, 2021, 10:31:57 PM »
we need to go back to the age when being an SNL movie was something you'd hide from advertising

mothman

  • I don't know why
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #991 on: October 13, 2021, 10:34:33 PM »
Don’t SNL films have a spectacularly low hit rate? Not sure how many there have been but they usually seem to flop (and are invariably terrible, to boot).

Mister Six

  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Feeling like Lemon Ken
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #992 on: October 13, 2021, 11:18:10 PM »
There are good SNL films - the two Wayne's Worlds, The Blues Brothers,

um.

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #993 on: October 13, 2021, 11:28:45 PM »
Macgruber's supposed to be good too which puts them level with Police Academy films

Old Nehamkin

  • You won, Jane.
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #994 on: October 13, 2021, 11:39:03 PM »
I'll always hold a candle for Coneheads.

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #995 on: October 14, 2021, 12:36:28 AM »
never seen it but 90s Dan Aykroyd is territory for the nutter

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #996 on: October 14, 2021, 05:12:58 PM »
Never going to see this infantile shit but I'd be less annoyed by its existence if it was called like Afterlife or something, own it's own space in the world but pertained to Ghostbusters, that's a nice formula actually, like how Prometheus is clearly an Alien film without being Aliens: Afterlife or whatever (I'm aware that Alien: Covenant kind of fucked up that nice little separate arc)

I'd like to see more sequels that don't mention the original in their titles.

The Colour of Ectoplasm

Replies From View

  • Rubbing linseed oil into the school cormorant.
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Gargoyles have milk bags.
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #997 on: October 14, 2021, 06:04:41 PM »
Plazm



with the z as some kind of inexplicable logo within the title

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #998 on: October 14, 2021, 07:18:21 PM »

Shameless Custard

  • PAUSE FOR THE JET
    • LastFM
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #999 on: October 14, 2021, 07:24:00 PM »
Hmm, that's ok, but I think I'd prefer to see a Ghostbuster getting a nosh

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1000 on: October 14, 2021, 07:50:00 PM »
"thats not good!!"

"hey buddy!!"

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1001 on: October 14, 2021, 08:26:26 PM »
Noshing a fire hydrant in the new trailer - https://streamable.com/6iiqnt

https://twitter.com/GBAfterlife/status/1447568930772602894


So the original Ghostbusters team wont be in it until the end then

Mister Six

  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Feeling like Lemon Ken
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1002 on: October 14, 2021, 09:19:52 PM »
Was that ever in doubt? One or two scenes where they come in to hold the fort while the kids save the day, then a bit of a coda, probably. Can't imagine Bill Murray being arsed to do much more than that, unless it was being directed by Wes Anderson or Jim Jarmusch.

Replies From View

  • Rubbing linseed oil into the school cormorant.
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Gargoyles have milk bags.
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1003 on: October 15, 2021, 06:28:23 AM »
Maybe their appearance at the end will be setting up the rest of the franchise with just them

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1004 on: October 15, 2021, 11:25:50 AM »
Nah, it's cats and dogs with proton packs strapped to their backs next time round.
Men, women, children, pets. Where next is the big question!

Hmm, that's ok, but I think I'd prefer to see a Ghostbuster getting a nosh

The ghostbursters are kids now, you monster!
Don't worry, I have it on good authority that that slimer gobbling the hydrant is a tease, a wink to the true fans, to say "don't worry, we've got your back".
The climax of the film is gonna blow your socks off!

Shameless Custard

  • PAUSE FOR THE JET
    • LastFM
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1005 on: October 15, 2021, 03:13:58 PM »
Be so great if it ended in a massive ghosts n Ghostbusters orgy

But only oral sex please

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1006 on: October 15, 2021, 11:08:03 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1007 on: October 15, 2021, 11:09:17 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1008 on: October 15, 2021, 11:10:37 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

chveik

  • crazy bit of business
Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1009 on: October 15, 2021, 11:11:08 PM »
ugh you are obsessed

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1010 on: October 15, 2021, 11:12:07 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1011 on: October 15, 2021, 11:13:45 PM »
this'll be great

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1012 on: October 15, 2021, 11:14:28 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1013 on: October 15, 2021, 11:51:08 PM »
Is it called Ghostbusters because it's about busting in a ghost's mouth after being sucked off to completion by a ghost

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1014 on: October 15, 2021, 11:53:05 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1015 on: October 15, 2021, 11:54:11 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1016 on: October 15, 2021, 11:55:07 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1017 on: October 15, 2021, 11:57:01 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1018 on: October 15, 2021, 11:58:44 PM »
ghost fellatio comment

Re: Ghostbusters 3: No Chicks Allowed
« Reply #1019 on: Yesterday at 12:05:18 AM »
ghost fellatio comment

Tags: