Author Topic: Labour Party discussion: "Shouting Starmer Starmer Starmer mega mega white man!"  (Read 26829 times)

Johnny Yesno

  • Perfume of a critic's burning flesh
    • Lines Horizontal
I've been posting on breakbeat/dnb forums the past week, and it's amazing how much more considered the conversation is. These are people who consider sporting Adidas sloth-wear the height of fashion


There's that kinder, gentler politics again!

Got to hand it to you, you're as inarticulate as you are repetitive. Anything more than a four letter word seems to trouble you.

Dickhead. Think that's more than four letters

Paul Calf

  • LOTION MAN
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • วชิราลงกรณ์คนงี่เง่าแห่งฆาตกร
Just ignore him, Jesus. This has gone from being one of the most intelligent, thoughtful corners of the web to one of the most idiotic and reactionary. I've been posting on breakbeat/dnb forums the past week, and it's amazing how much more considered the conversation is. These are people who consider sporting Adidas sloth-wear the height of fashion ffs. Raise your game Cabbers.

It is The Cancer That Is Killing CaB.

Danger Man

  • Let's stand together
Just ignore him, Jesus. This has gone from being one of the most intelligent, thoughtful corners of the web to one of the most idiotic and reactionary. I

Still good for comedy, movies, TV and general Bullshit. Very good on the coronazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

But politically it's dead.

The Corbyn era was a catastrophe for Labour, seems like a few on here have yet to come to that realisation. 

Buelligan

  • STOP being afraid
The Corbyn era was a catastrophe for Labour, seems like a few on here have yet to come to that realisation. 

Mmm?  Yep, most people really.  Notable exceptions being Danger Man (in all his incarnations), you - drizzle (in all your incarnations), Milverton (in all his incarnations) and all the Paulies.  Speaks volumes.

Mmm?  Yep, most people really.  Notable exceptions being Danger Man (in all his incarnations), you - drizzle (in all your incarnations), Milverton (in all his incarnations) and all the Paulies.  Speaks volumes.

Ah that old trope.  "All dissenters MUST be aliases using multiple accounts!!!"   Just another straw man in reality. 

Ah that old trope.  "All dissenters MUST be aliases using multiple accounts!!!"   Just another straw man in reality.

Like many on the hard left, Buelligan is a professionally paranoid conspiracy theorist, be it 'da jooz' or otherwise.

When facts and logic don't go your way you have to have something to 'explain' stuff. The cognitive dissonance is very real. The mental gymnastics required to maintain these positions is very tiring, hence the constant outpourings of frustration and grief on here and elsewhere. 

"Fuck off/cunt etc - stop disrupting our circle jerk!"

Buelligan

  • STOP being afraid
Ah that old trope.  "All dissenters MUST be aliases using multiple accounts!!!"   Just another straw man in reality. 

Not at all.  Just marking a truth that's evident for anyone who cares to look.  You asked people to look by saying -

The Corbyn era was a catastrophe for Labour, seems like a few on here have yet to come to that realisation. 

The implication being that the wise majority see this thing that you're alleging.  I'm just pointing out that a majority is easy to create the appearance of when you clone one side of the discussion.  That's a plain fact.

Of course, another deception is the idea that truth is decided by majority opinion.  An obvious falsehood.

Danger Man

  • Let's stand together
Ah that old trope.  "All dissenters MUST be aliases using multiple accounts!!!"   Just another straw man in reality.

I haven't used another account in years*. Don't think I've ever used a second account on the politics threads.

The only known case of a fake account on this type of thread is Paul Calf/Ashbury.


*Apart from 'Straw Man', ironically enough.

Buelligan

  • STOP being afraid
Nevertheless, the striking commonality between you, DM, and other people who visit these threads to disrupt them is the fact that you use or have used, multiple accounts, often with malice aforethought.  I say no more than that.  And that is the unvarnished truth, welcome or not.

Like many on the hard left, Buelligan is a professionally paranoid conspiracy theorist, be it 'da jooz' or otherwise.

When facts and logic don't go your way you have to have something to 'explain' stuff. The cognitive dissonance is very real. The mental gymnastics required to maintain these positions is very tiring, hence the constant outpourings of frustration and grief on here and elsewhere. 

"Fuck off/cunt etc - stop disrupting our circle jerk!"

I consider this to be an antisemitic and offensive statement.  Please apologise immediately. 

BlodwynPig

  • The Last Living Member of COVID-20
Like many on the hard left, Buelligan is a professionally paranoid conspiracy theorist, be it 'da jooz' or otherwise.

When facts and logic don't go your way you have to have something to 'explain' stuff. The cognitive dissonance is very real. The mental gymnastics required to maintain these positions is very tiring, hence the constant outpourings of frustration and grief on here and elsewhere. 

"Fuck off/cunt etc - stop disrupting our circle jerk!"

This is anti-semitic, please apologise. Will you apologise?

Johnny Yesno

  • Perfume of a critic's burning flesh
    • Lines Horizontal
The only known case of a fake account on this type of thread is Paul Calf/Ashbury.

Your Danger Man account is a fake account that you use to pretend to be disinterested and generally above it all in this type of thread, landlord.

I consider this to be an antisemitic and offensive statement.  Please apologise immediately.

Oh the irony. I point out out the hard lefts well established problem with Jews (hows the EHRC investigation going BTW?) you claim victimhood. You're taking this one firmly on the chin. 

This is anti-semitic, please apologise. Will you apologise?

"Fuck off/cunt etc"

BlodwynPig

  • The Last Living Member of COVID-20
"Fuck off/cunt etc"

"Ad hominem etc, yeah?"

"Ad hominem etc, yeah?"

You don't do irony clearly.

These are the "adults" that are running things now.

Buelligan

  • STOP being afraid
Oh the irony. I point out out the hard lefts well established problem with Jews (hows the EHRC investigation going BTW?) you claim victimhood. You're taking this one firmly on the chin.

I'm not claiming victimhood.  I'm saying that bandying about terms like the one you did, in the way you did, feeds antisemitism and is to be deplored.  Further, you have no idea who or what I am.  Your remark was offensive, you should withdraw it and apologise.

Ah that old trope.  "All dissenters MUST be aliases using multiple accounts!!!"   Just another straw man in reality.

I remember Paulie writing that, word for word.

BlodwynPig

  • The Last Living Member of COVID-20
You don't do irony clearly.

That's why I look like a tramp at business meetings

I'm not claiming victimhood.  I'm saying that bandying about terms like the one you did, in the way you did, feeds antisemitism and is to be deplored.  Further, you have no idea who or what I am.  Your remark was offensive, you should withdraw it and apologise.

You supported a man / party that enabled anti semitism on an industrial scale - you're the one who should be apologising. 

Not at all.  Just marking a truth that's evident for anyone who cares to look.

The problem here is this isn't "a truth".  You've just decided for yourself that posters you disagree with must be using multiple accounts, seemingly because another forum member did this in the past. 

I remember Paulie writing that, word for word.

Well that's either an incredible coincidence or he just said something similar and you've made that up.  I'm guessing latter.

Danger Man

  • Let's stand together
Your Danger Man account is a fake account that you use to pretend to be disinterested and generally above it all in this type of thread, landlord.

I wouldn't say I was disinterested.

You supported a man / party that enabled anti semitism on an industrial scale - you're the one who should be apologising.
You support a group that deliberately sat on accusations of anti-semitism in order to make a man who was guilty of being a socialist in a socialist party look bad. So please...

Paul Calf

  • LOTION MAN
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • วชิราลงกรณ์คนงี่เง่าแห่งฆาตกร
I know.  But I think it's important to keep these threads on topic.  The reason this twat comes here is to disrupt them.  So I ask again dunelm,


*whistles*

*looks at sky*

You support a group that deliberately sat on accusations of anti-semitism in order to make a man who was guilty of being a socialist in a socialist party look bad. So please...

I support neither. You on the other hand... Are you saying labour doesn't have a problem with AS? Is that what you're seriously suggesting?

kittens

  • kittens
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • don't have a cow man
please can you just ignore the big fat dummy

BlodwynPig

  • The Last Living Member of COVID-20
I support neither. You on the other hand... Are you saying labour doesn't have a problem with AS? Is that what you're seriously suggesting?

Are you going to apologise for your anti-semitic slurs. There is a growing number of calls for your resignation over this matter. Not a good look for the Far-Right Tofu stomping illiterate elite.

Tags: