Author Topic: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?  (Read 18746 times)

chveik

  • vampires have it easy
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #60 on: October 07, 2020, 11:38:47 PM »
I say it only to cut through the humbug: there is nothing wrong with phwoaring women for their skills in combination with good looks. It's the ones who are only good looking that are sexist to phwoar. It is better to share a picture of a beautiful bon-viveur like Katie Puckrick, Yaught-Rock afficianado and expert in scents:



than to share a picture of ...human being, Tara Babcock:



who, if I were attracted to, I should rather keep to myself in mixed company like these forums.

I think it's pretty sexist to assume that porn acting isn't a skill.

Butchers Blind

  • I don't want the undertaker stealing my sins
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #61 on: October 07, 2020, 11:41:26 PM »
Has anyone heard of porn?  There's loads of it on Internet and I should know. Wanked myself dry many a time.

PlanktonSideburns

  • we got the funke
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #62 on: October 07, 2020, 11:48:25 PM »
think people should keep their sexual interests to themselves. dont understand why people feel like sharing this information with people who theyre not romantically involved with

"i'll tell you who i fancy tho...."

yea, you bloody will, wont you?

feel the same about political opinions and music taste to be honest

in fact anything

just shut the fuck up until i ask you something

canadagoose

  • Member
  • **
  • inoperable brain bum hole
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #63 on: October 07, 2020, 11:50:02 PM »
I think it's fine. I've been known to post a few women and men in there over the years, although not very many. Yeah, it's not very "proper" and I'm sure you could critique it to hell and back, but it's mostly fun. Usually All Surrogate is there to balance out the gender ratio, but he does have an uphill battle on his hands.

madhair60

  • カッコイイ
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • バカ
    • Comics, videos, podcasts, writing, etc
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #64 on: October 08, 2020, 12:00:31 AM »
yeah it's shithouse. not because of it being sexist or anything, it's just a bad and boring thread. couldn't give a fuck who you're attracted to. unless it's me, obviously, in which case slide into my PMs hahaha banter

Cuellar

  • I'm over here
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #65 on: October 08, 2020, 12:01:04 AM »
I like it when they post the strong women

Retinend

  • Member
  • **
  • gettit done gettit on gettit done when you do it
    • Goodreads profile
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #66 on: October 08, 2020, 12:02:26 AM »
Isn't "sapiosexuality" just the opposite of "zoophilia"?

PlanktonSideburns

  • we got the funke
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #67 on: October 08, 2020, 12:02:49 AM »
thought the comments about the strong women were a bit fucking purile

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #68 on: October 08, 2020, 12:05:07 AM »
Quote
author=PlanktonSideburns link=topic=83011.msg4338720#msg4338720 date=1602110905]
think people should keep their sexual interests to themselves. dont understand why people feel like sharing this information with people who theyre not romantically involved with

Well I don't tell my other half who I fancy, doesn't usually go down too well.

Tony Tony Tony

  • CaB Worm Charming Runner Up 2018-2020
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #69 on: October 08, 2020, 12:35:44 AM »
Well I don't tell my other half who I fancy, doesn't usually go down too well.

Same here. When I was asked who I thought was sexy, my reply of "her at number 23" led to a very frosty evening.

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #70 on: October 08, 2020, 12:36:06 AM »
had a chekky wank over the strong women tbh

Clownbaby

  • Toe to tip, this is a Bart
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #71 on: October 08, 2020, 12:36:58 AM »
As a woman what is in my 20s I don't personally give a shite either way about the thread, as long as people in there are just simply pointing out someone they think is fit. I like to perv over celebs as well. When the odd person starts being a weird intense twat in there it just makes me cringe, more than anything. You can express your taste in beauty and sexiness without being a crass, weird twat about it, it's not that hard (wink wink that's what she said wink) I'm not about to get at anyone for admiring the tits of an actress from the 60s though when I just zoned out and stared at a GIF of Adam Driver's arse for about 4 minutes the other day. I just don't bother looking at the thread though. I don't really know what kind of state it's in at the moment. It just boils down to being more cringe and too-much-information than actually making me angry or uncomfortable.
« Last Edit: October 08, 2020, 12:51:54 AM by Clownbaby »

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #72 on: October 08, 2020, 12:48:24 AM »
How could a thread be sexist when it introduced me to that supernaturally attractive Dutch cyclist that was posted in there a couple months ago? Did you get a look at her? Hatchi MATCHI!

Shoulders?-Stomach!

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Unexpected item in stagging area
    • http://jackanderton.jamendo.net/
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #73 on: October 08, 2020, 12:50:32 AM »
Take your top off.

That's not a top, that's my real torso.

Captain Z

  • CABBALD
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #74 on: October 08, 2020, 01:28:45 AM »
That's not a top, that's my real shoulders; stomach.

FerriswheelBueller

  • CaB rear of the year 2020
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Take it easy, but take it.
    • I am antsy for baseball in the off-season.
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #75 on: October 08, 2020, 01:34:30 AM »
Well, there hasn't been one in a while... It was basically the opposite of the PHWOAARR thread

I posted in one :(

Don’t think anyone even made a bald comment because a) I have a luscious full head of locks and b) I cleverly posted an image of myself with a load of other people standing about and, while it was obvious which one I was, posters took the bait and mocked the strangers in the background leaving my ego (relatively) intact. Flawless.

Not seen a post in there for quite some time though.

Ptolemy Ptarmigan

  • Far away is close at hand
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #76 on: October 08, 2020, 02:09:31 AM »
I avoid the PHWOARR thread because unlike Dr. Dre I think bitches are shit, actually.

kalowski

  • the Zone of Zero Funkativity
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #77 on: October 08, 2020, 06:42:02 AM »
Nothing to do with the thread topic but I went to see "Naked Boys Singing" in a very cold beer garden at the weekend, where six men in their twenties / thirties sing a number of songs completely naked. After about half an hour of staring at the various penises I've come to the discussion that anyone who finds a penis attractive is weird. Sure, men can be sexy, but their genitals? Nope, it's official, they're bloody rubbish.
Like Adrian Edmondson wrote in How to be a Complete bastard:
Quote
Who wants to see a pair of bollocks on page 3? Who's going to say "Look at the bollocks on that! I wish my missus had bollocks like that."

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #78 on: October 08, 2020, 08:10:51 AM »
just sexy people don't overthink it

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #79 on: October 08, 2020, 08:26:08 AM »
I say it only to cut through the humbug: there is nothing wrong with phwoaring women for their skills in combination with good looks. It's the ones who are only good looking that are sexist to phwoar. It is better to share a picture of a beautiful bon-viveur like Katie Puckrick, Yaught-Rock afficianado and expert in scents:



than to share a picture of ...human being, Tara Babcock:



who, if I were attracted to, I should rather keep to myself in mixed company like these forums.

Seriously fuck this attitude. Most sexist post in the thread. Way more sexist than anything in the phwoar thread.

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #80 on: October 08, 2020, 08:28:52 AM »
"I'm a much more progressive, intelligent man. I objectify women for their MINDS!!! (As long as they are also conventionally attractive obviously) Fancying porn stars is bad and wrong, they aren't as good or valid as other women, and you should be ashamed for linking them."

Fuck off.

touchingcloth

  • Member
  • **
  • You wanna plack the rick, you ha.
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #81 on: October 08, 2020, 08:34:50 AM »
I don’t like the phwoar thread, or posts of a phwoar nature, partly because I don’t give two shits who any given poster wants to fuck, and partly because the thread and posts are pretty one-sided and male in nature. I know that there are more male than female posters here, but it feels like even so the phwoar posts by men are disproportionate.

buzby

  • Member
  • **
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #82 on: October 08, 2020, 09:30:29 AM »
I think my only contibution was pointing out that a OO-scale model bus used in a photo recreating an On The Buses scene of Stan and Chalky leering at a lady with model railway figures had the wrong garage plate and fleet number for a bus used in the show.

thenoise

  • Golden Member
  • *****
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #83 on: October 08, 2020, 09:31:57 AM »
Weirdly snobbish to only allow yourself to wank over appreciate sexy pictures of women if they have decent jobs or whatever. If you were truly attracted to their achievements or careers, you'd post a picture of their CV.

Phwooaarrrr check out her A levels ... and 2 Russell group degrees! *cums*

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #84 on: October 08, 2020, 09:37:08 AM »
Same here. When I was asked who I thought was sexy, my reply of "her at number 23" led to a very frosty evening.

"Your mum's still got it" did for me...

Buelligan

  • STOP being afraid
Why do so many people have negative body images?
« Reply #85 on: October 08, 2020, 09:37:56 AM »
Weirdly snobbish to only allow yourself to wank over appreciate sexy pictures of women if they have decent jobs or whatever. If you were truly attracted to their achievements or careers, you'd post a picture of their CV.

Phwooaarrrr check out her A levels ... and 2 Russell group degrees! *cums*

I'm guessing, that if you felt, even remotely, like that, you probably wouldn't even bother with a Phwooar thread.  But I acknowledge there aren't enough places objectifying other humans on the net.  So it's a great thing that we provide a safe space for healthy people to safely admire the human form in a healthy natural balanced normal inclusive healthy safe modern way that's not like the Sun at all.  Golf balls in bin bags.

Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #86 on: October 08, 2020, 09:43:29 AM »

I have to say, that TV campaign by No More Page Three a few years ago (where the kid sees a pair of fried eggs transmogrify into tits) was one of the most unintentionally hilarious things I've seen, unfortunately.

Really struggling to find this but I must see it.

Retinend

  • Member
  • **
  • gettit done gettit on gettit done when you do it
    • Goodreads profile
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #87 on: October 08, 2020, 09:58:57 AM »
Weirdly snobbish to only allow yourself to wank over appreciate sexy pictures of women if they have decent jobs or whatever. If you were truly attracted to their achievements or careers, you'd post a picture of their CV.

Phwooaarrrr check out her A levels ... and 2 Russell group degrees! *cums*

Oh dear. I'm sorry that I offended people with that post. If it matters, my intention was also to point out that "if you were only attracted to someone's career, you'd post a picture of their CV". i.e. I am obviously as attracted to Tara Babcock as to Katie Puckrick but [joke]I, self-conscious hypocrite, would normally never admit to that in public[/joke].

To be super-duper clear, I wasn't saying that it is bad to be attracted to pornstars, but only that - as a social fact; not my judgement - it is unseemly in society to admit to such.

Or maybe I'm just crazy and that's an outdated social heuristic. I'm a work-in-progress, as the yanks say.

FerriswheelBueller

  • CaB rear of the year 2020
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Take it easy, but take it.
    • I am antsy for baseball in the off-season.
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #88 on: October 08, 2020, 10:08:34 AM »
I think my only contibution was pointing out that a OO-scale model bus used in a photo recreating an On The Buses scene of Stan and Chalky leering at a lady with model railway figures had the wrong garage plate and fleet number for a bus used in the show.

Disgusting. Should be ashamed.

Blumf

  • Not long now
    • IGNORE ME!!!
Re: Is the PHWOAARR thread we have a bit rum?
« Reply #89 on: October 08, 2020, 10:47:33 AM »
I think my only contibution was pointing out that a OO-scale model bus used in a photo recreating an On The Buses scene of Stan and Chalky leering at a lady with model railway figures had the wrong garage plate and fleet number for a bus used in the show.

Ah, I recognise your writing from Penthouse Forum.

Tags: