Only Fans and all that stuff...

[Blumf]

I'll post the link to my OF site later.  Its mostly just vids of me eating a giant bag of wotsits, having a wank and crying.  £20 monthly subscription.

Sorry mate, Mark Lamarr does that, but with Quavers and it's only 15 quid.

[Wonderful Butternut]

I'll post the link to my OF site later.  Its mostly just vids of me eating a giant bag of wotsits, having a wank and crying.  £20 monthly subscription.

Not as good as Belle Delphine Stroking two BIG cocks:

[JamesTC]

I'm disappointed by the size of those cocks.

[the]

And that they're hens. Apart from that, joke works on every level

[imitationleather]

Cocks are absolutely terrifying. You don't want to be in an enclosed space with two of them!

I'm not going to let anyone make the obvious gag by specifically stating I am not talking about penises here. Just making the point that I'm not surprised they substituted them for docile hens.

[Marner and Me]

I bet you love being in a glory hole with two menacing cocks thrusting at you, you dirty old bollocks

[JamesTC]

And that they're hens. Apart from that, joke works on every level

Now I understand why it only has 43%.

[Captain Z]

Only Fans and Horses

[JamesTC]

Stick a pony in me PayPal
I'll fetch the videos from the LAN
Cause if you want the best nudes
And you don't want ad interludes
Then brother I'm your solo woman

What you all cum for
Is the nudity
It's like the changing of the tiers
And the higher fee
But heres the one thats driving me to sex work
Why do only fans and horses jerk
La la lala - la la la la la

[Captain Z]

Brilliant

[Anagram of a Shit Name]

My girlfriend has an Onlyfans page.

There is a small part of me that appears on her content too 😉

It's very tempting to tell you her name so all you dirty bollocks subscribe and make us rich!

[Icehaven]

Stick a pony in me PayPal
I'll fetch the videos from the LAN
Cause if you want the best nudes
And you don't want ad interludes
Then brother I'm your solo woman

What you all cum for
Is the nudity
It's like the changing of the tiers
And the higher fee
But heres the one thats driving me to sex work
Why do only fans and horses jerk
La la lala - la la la la la

+1

[Wonderful Butternut]

My girlfriend has an Onlyfans page.

Cuck.


[This is a joke, for the less cranially advanced]

[Blinder Data]

There is a small part of me that appears on her content too 😉

he means his knob!!

[Sebastian Cobb]

I sent my mate that takeaway '90s school meal' that was a load of frozen shit at a high markup, saying it was a 'Kerry Katona' munchy box and he told me she's seemingly making decent money on there now.

I didn't really have much use for such information but am inclined to pay it forward.

[TrenterPercenter]

That's how they're encouraged to feel by the content creators, it's all false.

https://youtu.be/ji5qepCx-8s

Interesting video.

It is overplaying the casino angle, in the digital development world it's just called gamification but the principle is the same,  it is focused on dopamine hits and this is relevant to things like onlyfans and candy crush is this respect.  It does raise moral questions though.

I'm going add to this in discussion in 2 parts.

Men

A much bigger aspect of the whole onlyfans things is fake intimacy.  These are men that don't just want sex (or rather to look at sex) they want a girlfriend, and they don't just want a girlfriend they want a highly attractive girlfriend that is quite amazingly interested in them and their interests.  Onlyfans gives them this and speaks to what i've said before about gender equality, that men in society are under pressure to instigate interactions with women and this is both sexist and has consequences for both men and women.  In recent times there has also been a celebration of female sexuality (and why not) and whilst accepted, the denigrating of male sexuality (sure, all the porn you can eat but its still disgusting that you look at it).  There is a big difference in looking at someones sexuality as them "exploring" & "connecting" with themselves and their bodies, to "you like tits and arses and you'd shag anything".  All these things are basically making typically emotionally illiterate men into finding easy solutions to these wants and desires with them delving deeper into artifical relationships.

Women

You can take the view that this is simply business and transactional.  They are providing a virtual girlfriend service and men are willing to pay for it, and indeed the deceit that comes with creating that illusion. 

You could also take the view these women are exploiting men, and this is different from the usual sex for money transactional relationship because there is an element of coersion from the seller.  An interesting counter example that flips the genders over is the spate of older women being conned into long distance relationships with younger men, often from abroad, in which they steadily request more and more money from the women whilst selling them romantic ideas about their future together.  The only difference is whether or not the consumer is completely aware of what this relationship is, that is the difference between being exploited and being a consumer. 

This is where your gamification comes back in how much are sellers concerned about ensuring they are not coercing people out of money whilst engaging in addictive presentations of their content.  Also is Onlyfans a good thing for gender equality? It can increase the safety of sex workers and provide them with control but is that all that really matters with this?

I would be interested to get both men and womens thoughts on these things

[JaDanketies]

Kerry Katona

I had a meal with Simon and Karen Danczuk back when they were relevant media personalities. I believe Karen is on Onlyfans these days too. Simon is probably also on it, pinging pictures of his willie to those who lie about being over 18, the greasy fuck.

[poo]

With this OnlyFans - are there things going in and out and all that? Glistening rods, pearly clams, that sort of malarkey?

[paruses]

That one off Big Brother who won the Golden Ticket (Suzy?) is on it. According the the article a friend read to me her daughter told her to get on there as it would boost her self esteem and earn her some honest cash.

It seems to be a normalized way to be in Reader's Wives these days and always be the £100 Wife of the Month winner.

[Spiteface]

With this OnlyFans - are there things going in and out and all that? Glistening rods, pearly clams, that sort of malarkey?

Depends which ones you're paying to look at.

[derek stitt]

Cheaper than buying a sex doll I suppose.

Not good for people to have imaginary friends as adults though is it.

[thenoise]

All seems a bit weird to me.

says 'thenoise', who pays to post on a fansite of 90s comedian Chris Morris, and hides his identity behind a cartoon avatar and a silly pseudonym.

[Ray Travez]

A much bigger aspect of the whole onlyfans things is fake intimacy. 

It's a kind of prostitution of affection. I don't know, I haven't been on only fans, but that's my sense as an outsider. I don't even know if its necessarily damaging to either party. The gamification element could be, but then that's being built into every platform now it seems.

There's always been a percentage of real world prostitution that has catered for men who need companionship, or a need for connection and understanding over and above sex, or even instead of it, so I guess this is nothing new. It's just packaged differently, with all the extra dopamine bells and whistles that an online experience can provide.

[jamiefairlie]

It's the logical end result of rampant uncontrolled capitalism, we're all just shameless prostitutes ready to sell off every piece of ourselves to the highest desperate drooling bidder. Everything's a fucking commodity. However it's inevitably packaged and sold as "empowering". Dismal.

[dissolute ocelot]

It's no worse than paying £3.99 to join the Bros fan club and get sent a list of Matt and Luke's favourite pizza toppings.

Just because there's boobies, it doesn't make it any more seedy. The really freaky stuff is just women in high heels standing on insects anyway.

[sirhenry]

It's the logical end result of rampant uncontrolled capitalism, we're all just shameless prostitutes ready to sell off every piece of ourselves to the highest desperate drooling bidder. Everything's a fucking commodity. However it's inevitably packaged and sold as "empowering". Dismal.

Would you like a soundtrack with that, sir? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnfKcZhbF_k

[paruses]

It's no worse than paying £3.99 to join the Bros fan club and get sent a list of Matt and Luke's favourite pizza toppings.

Just because there's boobies, it doesn't make it any more seedy. The really freaky good value stuff is just women in high heels standing on insects anyway.

I agree and have nothing against people being content creators in principle and if I need to see a pair of abstract tits then it seems reasonable to compensate the owner. What amazes me most is how it appears to have become so mainstream so quickly. I can imagine those weird dads who do the whole "my little girl's never having a boyfriend" thing would be OK saying "oh yea our Janine's on that. Makes a few quid too" (n.b. this is all in my head but wouldn't surprise me).

Trenter's points about the balance of exploitation are interesting and of more value than simply pronouncing something good or bad because it's nudity or sex.

[Ambient Sheep]

The really freaky stuff is just women in high heels standing on insects anyway.

Really?!  I believe that might be illegal.  Not sure.

[paruses]

Really?!  I believe that might be illegal.  Not sure.

Wouldn't it depend on where it was made? Or is there a restriction on viewing such stuff?

Curious rather than coming across as now being really nervous and formatting hard drives.

[Jim_MacLaine]

It's all roses until it goes a bit Grant Amato.