https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ldmznm5sxw
Bit so-so according to this.
Sounds like fan-nit-picking to me. He says that they handled his favorite parts of O'Neal's career in a "brief and superficial" way, yet the documentary had the man's life to cover in 90 minutes, and he doesn't seem to appreciate that he's a superfan and the documentary was intended for any casual Comedy Central viewer.
It seems like he's one of these people who likes O'Neal because of his association with Opie and Anthony... and this fanbase is an extremely mixed bunch.
Instead of
this documentary, it seems that what
he wanted was a "RED PILL" guide to the "philosophy of O'Neal", as it was (he actually uses the word "philosophy" without qualification) - he complains that they "sugar-coated" his views on race, and complains about how they omitted a supposedly famous clip of him "abusing strippers until they cried" to demonstrate how cowardly the documentary regarded his uncompromising attitude towards women.
Yet the documentary that
I saw covered these topics at sufficient length. If we didn't directly hear that clip, I think the point about his sexism was already implied by his friends and spouse telling us he was no different on- and offscreen, and by us hearing the sorts of things he had to say in his act about women being a "series of holes", and his celebration of infidelity.
On that point, this reviewer also seems to have a big problem with Bonnie McFarlene appearing on screen because he presumes her being in the documentary is merely a kind of affirmative action.