Author Topic: Ex-royals had sex again  (Read 2767 times)

bakabaka

  • Have we got over our differences yet? (ho/hum)
Ex-royals had sex again
« on: June 06, 2021, 05:45:14 PM »
And had a kid whose name appears to be an anagram of its income stream, or a request to the media.

Meet baby Libelit.

[insert meme face on baby image here]

imitationleather

  • "The French... are famous... for their kissing"
    • http://last.fm/user/ImiLeathr
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2021, 05:46:02 PM »
It's Lilibet.

Sounds like something a mid-table Premier League team would have on the front of their shirts.

madhair60

  • わたしは価値がないと感じます
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • ほっといてくれ
    • Comics, videos, podcasts, writing, etc
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2021, 05:47:01 PM »
wish i could have sex

imitationleather

  • "The French... are famous... for their kissing"
    • http://last.fm/user/ImiLeathr
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2021, 05:47:30 PM »
You only have to ask.

BlodwynPig

  • The Last Living Member of COVID-20
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2021, 05:49:32 PM »
Lilibet sounds like that female demon from Millennium with the lisp

Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2021, 05:55:58 PM »
Lilibet sounds like the type of place that would offer a free £5 bet on England to beat Romania to new customers.

Butchers Blind

  • Adios pantaloons!
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2021, 05:57:37 PM »
Sounds like Lil-lets, which was my sister's choice of tampon.

Elderly Sumo Prophecy

  • Your sleep paralysis demon
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2021, 05:59:19 PM »
If they'd called her Lilibert they could also have honoured Bertie, the Queen's dad, at the same time.

touchingcloth

  • Member
  • **
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2021, 06:02:01 PM »
How do we know they had sex rather than cumming in a flagon and firing it up her cunt with a turkey baster?

mothman

  • I don't know why
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2021, 06:28:56 PM »
 You could ask I suppose.

Fambo Number Mive

  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • MAKE ROOM FOR THE MUSHROOMS
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2021, 06:30:39 PM »
Darren flagboy isn't happy:

Quote
The name of the new Sussex child is awful, it’s like they’ve asked a machine-based algorithm that is based on a Buzzfeed quiz on The Crown. Also a little rich of them to take ‘Lilibet’ given all they have put HM The Queen through over recent times

Isn't he basically insulting the Queen's nickname with the first part of that tweet? Imagine responding to the birth of a child by tweeting out how much you dislike it's name.

icehaven

  • WORLD'S BIGGEST RIP OFF: $100 PER PERSON
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2021, 06:32:06 PM »
Lilo lil.

Wonderful Butternut

  • Summer Night City!
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2021, 06:48:44 PM »
Wasn't "Lilibet" George V's pet name for Elizabeth II when she was little?

They just swapped some letters around.

shiftwork2

  • pies this is your time
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2021, 06:49:24 PM »
So as the daughter of a ‘duke’ and a ‘duchess’, does this thing have some fake silly bastard form of address like ‘wizard’ or ‘big lord’?

Blue Jam

  • press A to cry
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2021, 06:54:55 PM »
Wasn't "Lilibet" George V's pet name for Elizabeth II when she was little?

Yes.

Top trolling tbf.

Blue Jam

  • press A to cry
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #15 on: June 06, 2021, 06:55:46 PM »

bakabaka

  • Have we got over our differences yet? (ho/hum)
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #16 on: June 06, 2021, 06:58:41 PM »
Imagine responding to the birth of a child by tweeting out how much you dislike it's name.
mea culpa.

So as the daughter of a ‘duke’ and a ‘duchess’, does this thing have some fake silly bastard form of address like ‘wizard’ or ‘big lord’?
Lilibet, Flangemistress of Kent, apparently.

It's a throwback to the 14th century, when these things were important.

Fambo Number Mive

  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • MAKE ROOM FOR THE MUSHROOMS
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #17 on: June 06, 2021, 07:00:11 PM »
There's a massive difference between doing it on here and doing it on Twitter though, especially if you had e a lot of followers like Darren flagboy.

Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2021, 07:01:26 PM »
So as the daughter of a ‘duke’ and a ‘duchess’, does this thing have some fake silly bastard form of address like ‘wizard’ or ‘big lord’?

They gave up their HRHses so it'll be lucky to be called Tesco's Finest.

bakabaka

  • Have we got over our differences yet? (ho/hum)
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #19 on: June 06, 2021, 07:02:08 PM »
They gave up their HRHses so it'll be lucky to be called Tesco's Finest.
Morrison's The Best.

chveik

  • OPEN THE PUBS BOYS
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #20 on: June 06, 2021, 07:03:47 PM »
Lil Ibet, already planning her cloud rap career

Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #21 on: June 06, 2021, 07:11:32 PM »
Mumsnet shitting themselves in rage, of course.

mothman

  • I don't know why
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #22 on: June 06, 2021, 08:50:33 PM »
Mumsnet shitting themselves in rage, of course.

Yeah? What’s their beef? Or is it just that they all stan Kate?

Cuntbeaks

  • Where you fay?
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #23 on: June 06, 2021, 09:31:13 PM »
Lilibet Diana, apparantly.

Ingratiating cunts.

thenoise

  • Golden Member
  • *****
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #24 on: June 06, 2021, 09:34:36 PM »
Yeah? What’s their beef? Or is it just that they all stan Kate?

Sounds a bit common.

Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #25 on: June 06, 2021, 09:37:21 PM »
Mumsnet shitting themselves in rage, of course.

About trans women or the timekeeping of their cleaners?

JesusAndYourBush

  • Earnest silky coconut shell
    • http://www.google.com
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #26 on: June 06, 2021, 09:54:05 PM »
Top trolling tbf.

It is! It looks like an attempt to ingratiate themselves back into the royal family, but it's so heavyhanded it'll just drive a bigger wedge between them.

Blue Jam

  • press A to cry
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #27 on: June 06, 2021, 09:54:36 PM »
Lilibet Diana, apparantly.

Ingratiating cunts.

Isn't Princess Spare's middle name also "Diana"?

I suppose it doesn't matter when it's the boring inoffensive older brother who chose the name for his sprog. Even if he did boff his wife's best mate.

Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #28 on: June 06, 2021, 10:57:02 PM »
I'm pleased to note that readers of the Daily Mail are going ballistic at the perceived slight to the Queen. I'd be happy if the twats just come clean that they don't like Meghan becasue she's half black, and is in their fevered mind something to oppose as a pawn in their culture war.

FerriswheelBueller

  • CaB rear of the year 2020
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Take it easy, but take it.
    • I am antsy for baseball in the off-season.
Re: Ex-royals had sex again
« Reply #29 on: June 06, 2021, 11:08:17 PM »
I hope the process for their American child’s application for recognition of British citizenship is as painless and straightforward as it was for my sprog x.

Tags: