Please let me know of any new bugs or issues in GB, thanks for your patience
Started by Norton Canes, August 10, 2021, 01:08:47 PM
Quote from: Ballad of Ballard Berkley on August 18, 2021, 05:18:25 PMLooks like the next series will be largely devoted to Spoiler alertthe Doctor finding out more about this Timeless Child bollocks[close].
Quote from: Ballad of Ballard Berkley on August 18, 2021, 05:18:25 PMLooks like the next series will be largely devoted to Spoiler alertthe Doctor finding out more about this Timeless Child bollocks[close].https://cultbox.co.uk/news/doctor-who-series-13-the-doctor-searches-for-answers-in-her-pastSpoiler alertA pathetically optimistic part of me hoped that Chibnall might've clocked the negative reaction to his grand fanwank vision and quietly drawn a veil over it. But no, he's seeing his teenage fantasy through to the bitter end. Fucking hell.[close]No idea why I've spoilered that really, as the link title gives it away. And I doubt anyone cares anyway.
Quote from: Kelvin on August 17, 2021, 06:43:43 PMI've always wondered if a single child ever actually hid behind a sofa when watching Dr Who. Has anyone ever worked out the first use of that phrase in relation to the show? Like an article or TV segment that first coined it?
Quote from: Kelvin on August 18, 2021, 06:31:52 PMSurely this isn't that surprising. The last series set up "Doctor Ruth", and The Division hunting her. it seemed inevitable that those storylines would be "explored" before the end of Chibnall's run. There's also the potential mystery of the little girl found at the portal (who allegedly became The Doctor) - something which might just be left as a pointless mystery, but could also be a setup for some other big reveal.
Quote from: Alberon on August 18, 2021, 07:10:05 PMIt's no surprise he's carrying on with the Timeless Wank but he really is going to leave the series as a smoking hole in the ground for the next showrunner.
Quote from: pigamus on August 17, 2021, 08:40:26 PMYeah to be fair I think they mean as in, hide behind one end of it so you can't see the telly
Quote from: Ballad of Ballard Berkley on August 18, 2021, 07:27:41 PMI actually get quite annoyed when I think of how Moffat tied up the Master storyline with such finesse, only for Chinballs to come along and undo all that work just two years later.
Quote from: Thomas on August 18, 2021, 08:42:13 PM'Two years' makes it feel like a slightly more reasonable distance; remember that in practice it was only twelve episodes.
Quote from: Ballad of Ballard Berkley on August 18, 2021, 07:27:41 PMHe's thick, isn't he? A dramatist who doesn't understand the fundaments of drama. A baffling man.
Quote from: FredNurke on August 18, 2021, 06:40:06 PMThe last I looked, it went back to about 1973, but didn't start getting really common till the early 1980s.
Quote from: Mister Six on August 18, 2021, 06:59:46 PMIf there isn't some kind of retcon to undo the Timeless Child bollocks, then the baby Doctor found at the portal will be created by present-day Doctor somehow and tossed through the wormhole, leading to The Doctor creating herself, in a way that Chibnall thinks is very clever, but was already done years ago in a 20-minute episode of a middling series of Red Dwarf.
QuoteDoctor Who is one of the most valued global brands and recognisable pieces of intellectual property, at a time when those things are more imporatnt and valuable than ever.
Quote from: olliebean on August 19, 2021, 04:32:55 PMIf Chibnall really wanted to fuck the next showrunner, he could have Jodie find her way to the universe that the Timeless Child came from, only to find it completely uninhabited, die and regenerate into the Timeless Child, and get sucked back into our universe through the portal that the Timeless Child came out of in the first place.
Quote from: mjwilson on August 19, 2021, 05:20:37 PMOn Twitter, Chibnall is being mocked over this piece of corporate guff from DWM
Page created in 0.043 seconds with 18 queries.