Main Menu

Tip jar

If you like CaB and wish to support it, you can use PayPal or KoFi. Thank you, and I hope you continue to enjoy the site - Neil.

Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com

Support CaB

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 17,819
  • Latest: Jeth
Stats
  • Total Posts: 5,578,475
  • Total Topics: 106,671
  • Online Today: 1,086
  • Online Ever: 3,311
  • (July 08, 2021, 03:14:41 AM)
Users Online
Welcome to Cook'd and Bomb'd. Please login or sign up.

April 20, 2024, 03:36:15 AM

Login with username, password and session length

X Marks the Cunt

Started by Blumf, March 01, 2022, 08:04:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Blumf

Needs a thread of it's own:

Quote from: jobotic on March 01, 2022, 05:43:31 PMMI5 and the government this time. Fucking hell

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/mar/01/bbc-spy-report-alleges-mi5-undercover-agent-abused-women-court-hears

Turns out, it's important for national security that we have a woman beating maniac on the payroll

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60579589
QuoteA BBC programme wants to name an MI5 agent because he represents a danger to other women and must be publicly identified to prevent future harm, the High Court has heard.
...
The legal battle is over whether the BBC can air a news story about a male MI5 informant known only in the court proceedings as "X".

If aired, the BBC's news report would claim that X used his status as an agent to abuse, control and coerce a former partner, referred to by the pseudonym "Beth" - and that MI5 either knew or ought to have known about this and was wrong to use him as an agent.

Another woman who alleges she was abused by him - known by the pseudonym "Ruth" - has said she fears X will kill a woman if he is not "challenged and exposed".

The government's Attorney General Suella Braverman is seeking an injunction to block the broadcast, arguing that identifying X would create a "real and immediate risk" of serious or life-threatening harm to him and would damage national security.

The man's a national treasure. He only beat them two 'cause the terrorist would win or Putin or something.

Fucking sick!

jobotic

Using the European Court of Human Rights too!

BlodwynPig

His name... Bond, James Bond

Probably a KGB agent posing as MI5 to discredit are brave speyes. Drone strikes on Moscow NOW.

shoulders


dissolute ocelot

This is why we need a government that can surveil and track every movement of the population, so no member of MI5 need ever sleep alone. Do your duty!

Or imprison them all in suitcases and let them die, that's also a valid option.

Buelligan

No need for an injunction, we all know it's Johnson. 

And that's the problem really.  We have abusers, their enablers, in great variety seeded throughout our society.  The whole thing needs more than a telly program if I'm honest.

Wayne Couzens is 50.



BlodwynPig

Never noticed the state of his teeth!? And he claims to have a warm relationship with the US?!!

thenoise

Quote from: BlodwynPig on March 02, 2022, 08:51:41 AMNever noticed the state of his teeth!? And he claims to have a warm relationship with the US?!!

He botched chipping his vampire tooth down, probably did it when he was drunk (on child blood).

Buelligan

He's a baboon.  Without the manners.

BlodwynPig

Quote from: thenoise on March 02, 2022, 08:56:46 AMHe botched chipping his vampire tooth down, probably did it when he was drunk (on child blood).

Look at his bottom row. Graveyard

touchingcloth

I like my toddlers like I like my martinis.

Blumf

Establishment knows best:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61021108
QuoteThe BBC is to be prevented from naming a man it says exploited his status as an MI5 informant to abuse a partner and poses an ongoing threat to women.

A High Court judge has ruled that identifying the man, known only as X, would create a "real and immediate" risk he would be killed or injured.

The judgement proceeds on the basis that X is a danger to women, but it makes no formal finding.

Gets even better

QuoteMr Justice Chamberlain concluded that disclosure of X's identity would have a wider damaging effect on national security because an agent who became aware of the BBC's story "would not necessarily assume that the story was accurate in every respect" and might conclude "it was based principally on the say-so" of one of the women.

The judge said this risked discouraging people from acting as agents, as they might think the trigger for disclosure of their identity was the making of an allegation, whether true or not.

The BBC's evidence included a video showing X attacking one of the women with a "dangerous weapon"

Um... what!?

shoulders

The judiciary need a fucking slap sometimes.

Literally no-one alive thinks that one of the downsides of joining MI5 as an agent is the especially precarious nature of employment vis a vis ethics.

touchingcloth


Elderly Sumo Prophecy

Quote from: BlodwynPig on March 02, 2022, 07:27:27 AMHis name... Bond, James Bond

STOP GETTING BOND WRONG

Bond is in MI6.

Blumf

Beeb allowed to report on him, but not reveal his identity:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61508520 (CW some really nasty domestic abuse)
QuoteAn MI5 spy used his status to terrorise his partner before moving abroad to continue intelligence work while under investigation, the BBC has found.

A video shows the man threatening to kill the woman and attacking her with a machete.

The foreign national cannot be named, despite evidence he is a threat to women, after the government took the BBC to court to block publication.

Evidence shows that he is a right-wing extremist with a violent past.

Very nasty story. How is this supposed to be dealt with? How do we know how valuable this person is to MI5?

steve98

He didn't "attack" her with a machete, he threatened her with it.