Author Topic: Facebook thread  (Read 184766 times)

Utter Shit

  • Snotty Bumstead
Facebook thread
« on: November 07, 2014, 12:50:54 PM »
Another one gone with no explanation.

Just saw this on an article about Michelle Heaton being a bitch:

Quote
Can't stand her , she only married Lisa Scott Lee brother for fame , she loves herself

Fucking...yes.

chand

  • "like Louise Mensch but with a sexy beard"
    • https://twitter.com/RopesToInfinity
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2014, 01:25:03 PM »
That's a boring reason to marry Lisa Scott-Lee's brother. A better reason would have been that she had an insatiable longing for Lisa Scott-Lee, and that her marriage to Lisa's brother was part of a twisted plan to get closer to Lisa so she could lez her right in the face.

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2014, 01:39:20 PM »
I actually know Michelle through her brother, she's a nice girl with me so I couldn't really comment.
However, if anything was to grab attention, it was having dem boobz hacked off just like Anjolie did.



Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2014, 06:16:17 PM »


School started sometime between 9am and 4pm? That must have been confusing.

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2014, 06:22:06 PM »
Hot summers? Are summers cold now or something? Insane. Like and share if you remember these? Why?
Facebook = confusion.

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2014, 06:35:19 PM »
I have such fond memories of "bath time, then bed". Why can't we have bath time, then bed anymore?

Uncle TechTip

  • Take that fucking avatar down. It's horrible.
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2014, 06:38:33 PM »
If anyone should feel responsible for 'no meant no' it would be today's parents who evidently spoil their children to the extent that no doesn't mean no. In fact most of these are the fault of the parents who are posting this.

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2014, 06:40:57 PM »
I have such fond memories of "bath time, then bed". Why can't we have bath time, then bed anymore?

D'ye'remember when no meant no? Somebody would ask you a question and you'd say no, wouldn't you? And they would take that to mean no. Not like today where no means yes and yes means no and maybe means definitely and definitely not means yes please. D'ye'remember Bullseye with Jim Bowen? etc...

JesusAndYourBush

  • Earnest silky coconut shell
    • http://www.google.com
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2014, 08:35:45 PM »


BOMBS BURSTING IN AIR! FUCK YEAH!!!!!

BritishHobo

  • That is a really reductive impression
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2014, 12:05:04 AM »
I've seen the national anthem sung in the minutes before an amusement park opened. Whoever these people are who think there's a lack of national feeling in the US are barking up the wrong sodding tree.

kitsofan34

  • everybody's clever nowadays
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2014, 12:27:21 AM »

Joy Nktonga

  • Arkologist
  • Golden Member
  • *****
  • Dub it up blacker than dread!
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2014, 08:42:39 AM »
Blimey the treatment's really hit Serge hard. I barely recognise him in those pictures.






Sorry Serge, love you really.

BlodwynPig

  • Throwing two dogs at a goblin
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2014, 08:58:37 AM »
Too Cool for Child Cancer

chand

  • "like Louise Mensch but with a sexy beard"
    • https://twitter.com/RopesToInfinity
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2014, 09:07:47 AM »
I like how it doesn't even bother to tell us who those people are. Just "Cancer! Think about cancer!".


Anyway, I'm off to reminisce about when a virus was an illness.

George Oscar Bluth II

  • Karma: +69 / -420
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2014, 05:29:26 PM »
Is it just me who has a huge ethical problem with parents putting pictures of their babies on Facebook? Not from a "omg pedos might see it!!!!" sort of way, but in a "they never consented to this" sort of way? As well as a "this is really private shit and I, someone you've not spoken to in four years, shouldn't be seeing it" way.

A couple of my former school friends have had babies this year and they seem to spend roughly 50% of their time at the moment taking and uploading photos of their spawn. It makes me feel weird and uncomfortable.

Thank fuck I was born in the 80s and all my baby pictures are in a box in my parents' attic.

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #15 on: December 27, 2014, 05:39:19 PM »
Thank fuck I was born in the 80s and all my baby pictures siblings are in a box in my parents' attic.

Uncle TechTip

  • Take that fucking avatar down. It's horrible.
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #16 on: December 27, 2014, 06:02:20 PM »
Is it just me who has a huge ethical problem with parents putting pictures of their babies on Facebook?

No, I have kids and I refuse to participate in this game of one-upmanship. I've always felt that people should give their consent before they allow someone to identify them in a Facebook photo, and same applies for kids. Until they can give their consent knowingly.

On the one hand I could say that it will lead to lots of embarrassed teenagers in a decade, but on the other it's so common that I expect they'll be picked on for not having photos from when they were three knocking round on Facebook.

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2014, 12:04:50 PM »
Is it just me who has a huge ethical problem with parents putting pictures of their babies on Facebook? Not from a "omg pedos might see it!!!!" sort of way, but in a "they never consented to this" sort of way? As well as a "this is really private shit and I, someone you've not spoken to in four years, shouldn't be seeing it" way.

Doesn't that apply to showing friends photos of your babies as well?  I hate seeing photos of babies anywhere, but I reckon you can fuck off talking about violating their privacy.  As if they're ever going to give a fuck.  They're pretty much anonymous blobs of shite until they're about five anyway.

In a world where a third of baby boys still have a part of their dick lopped off at birth, I find it hard to care about them not being able to consent to having their photograph taken.

George Oscar Bluth II

  • Karma: +69 / -420
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2014, 11:08:23 AM »
There's a difference between "showing your friends photos of your baby", which is a lovely thing to do, and posting pictures onto the internet indefinitely for 200+ people who you sort of know to see.

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2014, 05:10:37 PM »

Garam

  • Parole Hearing: 99/99/9999
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2014, 05:26:41 PM »
Brilliant.

George Oscar Bluth II

  • Karma: +69 / -420
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #21 on: January 01, 2015, 01:44:42 AM »
SO TRUE

Nobody Soup

  • ephedrine and orange juice... and also ket
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #22 on: January 02, 2015, 12:13:59 PM »
lovely elderly-relative inadvertently says something quite rude moment last night, talking about how making cocktails was the latest faddy thing my girlfriends mum was doing.



to which her grandad replied


Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #23 on: January 02, 2015, 12:37:36 PM »
They're pretty much anonymous blobs of shite until they're about five anyway.

LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION.

Quincey

  • Silver Member
  • ****
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #24 on: January 04, 2015, 01:34:13 PM »
Instead of asking people to repost an image in honour of fighting cancer, why don't they ask people to do something practical like raise awareness of how to support people with cancer or make a donation to a cancer charity?

Sharing some image that says if you don't share this, you are selfish, is all about feeling good and does nothing to help people who have cancer or know someone with cancer.

You'd think someone would notice the typo and create a correct one at the very least.

Have you ever unfriended someone because of the crap they post?

Someone's posted a picture of a tiny cat with "If I were tiny I would sleep on a marshmallow". All very cute but who cares? Why is that worth sharing?

Shoulders?-Stomach!

  • Are we human? Or are we toilet
    • http://jackanderton.jamendo.net/
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #25 on: January 04, 2015, 02:38:28 PM »
What about all the posts from motherfucking TIMEHOP


HERE IS MY KID THAT I POST PICTURES OF NEARLY EVERY DAY AGED WHEN SHE WAS AGED TWO


AWW HERE SHE IS AGAIN HOW TIME FLIES!!!


AWW HERE SHE IS AGAIN WHAT A CUTIE!!!


FUCK YOU
FUCK YOU


FUCK YOU




Shoulders?-Stomach!

  • Are we human? Or are we toilet
    • http://jackanderton.jamendo.net/
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #26 on: January 04, 2015, 02:43:07 PM »
If it's not that then it's

LOL THAT WAS AN EPIC NIGHT OUT

lol yeah mate dat was sick
10 minutes ago

LOL GOT SO WASTERD!!
5 minutes ago

haha look at him
1 minute ago

Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #27 on: January 04, 2015, 03:46:51 PM »
What about those "this was my year" things? Who on earth wants to look at a slideshow of someone's year on facebook? I mean, unless you're stalking that person or something I can't see the appeal.

BritishHobo

  • That is a really reductive impression
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #28 on: January 04, 2015, 06:10:20 PM »
There was a whole scandal about it in the news a week or so back because a couple of people got pictures of things like their daughter who died that year.

WesterlyWinds

  • Gigalithine Lenticular Entity
Re: Facebook thread
« Reply #29 on: January 04, 2015, 10:30:16 PM »
Did anyone point out to them that technically since it happened that year they should SHUT THE FUCK UP?